Looking for older source (2.2.9.6)

This forum is only for questions or discussions about working with the mojoPortal source code in Visual Studio, obtaining the source code from the repository, developing custom features, etc. If your question is not along these lines this is not the right forum. Please try to post your question in the appropriate forum.

Please do not post questions about design, CSS, or skinning here. Use the Help With Skins Forum for those questions.

This forum is for discussing mojoPortal development

This forum is only for questions or discussions about working with the mojoPortal source code in Visual Studio, obtaining the source code from the repository, developing custom features, etc. If your question is not along these lines this is not the right forum. Please try to post your question in the appropriate forum.

You can monitor commits to the repository from this page. We also recommend developers to subscribe to email notifications in the developer forum as occasionally important things are announced.

Before posting questions here you might want to review the developer documentation.

Do not post questions about design, CSS, or skinning here. Use the Help With Skins Forum for those questions.
This thread is closed to new posts. You must sign in to post in the forums.
3/13/2012 5:39:53 PM
Gravatar
Total Posts 4

Looking for older source (2.2.9.6)

I have a customer with a customized, large-scale implementation of their portal on top of ver2.2.9.6.  I'd like to fix some of their issues in the current version and make an upgrade a separate project.  I've searched and seen a few of the older links to source (Codeplex and forgesvn1/Novell) but they don't seem to be responding to SVN so I'm guessing they're deprecated?  Codeplex does have the release package for 2.2.9.6, but its listing for source checkins only go back to June 2010, and I think 2.2.9.6 looks like it was released  Mar 24th 2009.

Is there a good location to grab archived source?

Any help much appreciated,
Geoff 

3/14/2012 8:32:07 AM
Gravatar
Total Posts 18439

Re: Looking for older source (2.2.9.6)

Hi Geoff,

Unfortunately the answer is no. We originally had our source code in an svn (Subversion) repository at Novell Forge, but they closed down and we moved to hg (Mercurial) at Codeplex in May 2010. So I don't know of any way to get the code as it was at version 2.2.9.6.

The biggest concern from what you mentioned though is that it was customized, if by that you mean they forked the mojoPortal code by modifying it then even if you could get the original code it would not have the customizations. I always tell people not to fork the code, doing that usually ends up coming back to bite someone in the long run. If they did fork the code they should have kept a copy of it.

It all depends on what is meant by customization, if it was just custom skinning, it should be possible to upgrade but I would do a practice run on a copy and work through any issues such as needed changes to fix older skins before attempting it on a production copy. Note also that we no longer support SQL 2000 so if they are using that it would be problematic to upgrade, SQL 2005 and up is fine.

It is also possible to implement and plugin custom features without forking the code but if they did that I would still expect them to have source code around.

Wish I could give you better news, I don't envy you having to figure out whether they forked it or not and trying to find a path forward if they did fork it and no longer have the code.

Best,

Joe

3/14/2012 4:59:56 PM
Gravatar
Total Posts 4

Re: Looking for older source (2.2.9.6)

Thanks for the quick response!  I wish the news was better too, but its kind of a worst case scenario here...so, its not an unexpected situation.  Chasing four year old source just ain't good no matter how you slice it. Wink

3/15/2012 7:46:13 AM
Gravatar
Total Posts 18439

Re: Looking for older source (2.2.9.6)

The one good thing going forward is that Mercurial since it is a distributed version control system, a local copy has the complete repository with all history of changes unlike subversion where the local copy is just the latest version. So even in the unlikely event that Codeplex shuts down some day I would still have the complete history going back to when we moved to Mercurial and I could move the repository hosting elsewhere.

Best,

Joe

You must sign in to post in the forums. This thread is closed to new posts.